human gdf 15 Search Results


99
R&D Systems duoset elisa
Duoset Elisa, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+gdf+15/bio_rxiv__2022__06__08__495255-195-7-9?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
duoset elisa - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
R&D Systems quantitative sandwich immunoassay technique
Quantitative Sandwich Immunoassay Technique, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+gdf+15/pmc11854348__ALZ___21___e14577___s001-35-7-15?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
quantitative sandwich immunoassay technique - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems human gdf 15
Human Gdf 15, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+gdf+15/pmc05867130-80-3-13?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human gdf 15 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
R&D Systems human gdf15 quantikine elisa kit
Women with hsCRP have high levels of <t>GDF15.</t> (a, b) Serum GDF15 levels were quantified by ELISA from HANDLS participants with either low- (<3 mg/L), mid- (>3–20 mg/L), or high hsCRP (>20 mg/L) levels ( n = 39/group). The ELISA assay was performed according to manufacturer's instructions and was repeated in 2 independent experiments. (c) RNA was isolated from PBMCs from HANDLS participants with either low- (<3 mg/L) or high hsCRP (>20 mg/L) levels ( n = 15/group). GDF15 mRNA was quantified by RT-qPCR and normalized to HPRT1 and UBC levels. The histograms represent the mean + SEM from three independent experiments. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 by Student's t -test.
Human Gdf15 Quantikine Elisa Kit, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+gdf+15/pmc06008756-47-0-5?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human gdf15 quantikine elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems quantikine elisa human gdf 15 immunoassay
Women with hsCRP have high levels of <t>GDF15.</t> (a, b) Serum GDF15 levels were quantified by ELISA from HANDLS participants with either low- (<3 mg/L), mid- (>3–20 mg/L), or high hsCRP (>20 mg/L) levels ( n = 39/group). The ELISA assay was performed according to manufacturer's instructions and was repeated in 2 independent experiments. (c) RNA was isolated from PBMCs from HANDLS participants with either low- (<3 mg/L) or high hsCRP (>20 mg/L) levels ( n = 15/group). GDF15 mRNA was quantified by RT-qPCR and normalized to HPRT1 and UBC levels. The histograms represent the mean + SEM from three independent experiments. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 by Student's t -test.
Quantikine Elisa Human Gdf 15 Immunoassay, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+gdf+15/pmc09813109-121-0-6?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
quantikine elisa human gdf 15 immunoassay - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
R&D Systems recombinant human gdf 15
Women with hsCRP have high levels of <t>GDF15.</t> (a, b) Serum GDF15 levels were quantified by ELISA from HANDLS participants with either low- (<3 mg/L), mid- (>3–20 mg/L), or high hsCRP (>20 mg/L) levels ( n = 39/group). The ELISA assay was performed according to manufacturer's instructions and was repeated in 2 independent experiments. (c) RNA was isolated from PBMCs from HANDLS participants with either low- (<3 mg/L) or high hsCRP (>20 mg/L) levels ( n = 15/group). GDF15 mRNA was quantified by RT-qPCR and normalized to HPRT1 and UBC levels. The histograms represent the mean + SEM from three independent experiments. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 by Student's t -test.
Recombinant Human Gdf 15, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+gdf+15/pm18550273-47-0-3?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant human gdf 15 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

91
R&D Systems gdf15 neutralizing ab mab957
Growth differentiation factor 15 <t>(GDF15)</t> expression is elevated in gastric cancer and high serum GDF15 level is a poor prognostic factor. (A) GDF15 gene expression level in gastric cancer patients illustrated with boxplots by the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) online database. (B) The Kaplan–Meier plotter online database was used to analyze the clinical effect of GDF15 gene expression in gastric cancer patients ( http://kmplot.com/analysis/ ). (C) Clinical effect of GDF15 serum levels (≥upper quartile 1066.79 ng/mL vs. <upper quartile) on overall survival and disease‐free survival. HR, hazard ratio; N, normal; STAD, stomach adenocarcinoma database; T, tumor. * p < 0.01.
Gdf15 Neutralizing Ab Mab957, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+gdf+15/pmc10394154-198-1-18?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gdf15 neutralizing ab mab957 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
91/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
R&D Systems anti human gdf 15 capture antibody
Growth differentiation factor 15 <t>(GDF15)</t> expression is elevated in gastric cancer and high serum GDF15 level is a poor prognostic factor. (A) GDF15 gene expression level in gastric cancer patients illustrated with boxplots by the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) online database. (B) The Kaplan–Meier plotter online database was used to analyze the clinical effect of GDF15 gene expression in gastric cancer patients ( http://kmplot.com/analysis/ ). (C) Clinical effect of GDF15 serum levels (≥upper quartile 1066.79 ng/mL vs. <upper quartile) on overall survival and disease‐free survival. HR, hazard ratio; N, normal; STAD, stomach adenocarcinoma database; T, tumor. * p < 0.01.
Anti Human Gdf 15 Capture Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+gdf+15/pm18550273-46-21-25?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti human gdf 15 capture antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Protein Simple Inc human gdf 15
Growth differentiation factor 15 <t>(GDF15)</t> expression is elevated in gastric cancer and high serum GDF15 level is a poor prognostic factor. (A) GDF15 gene expression level in gastric cancer patients illustrated with boxplots by the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) online database. (B) The Kaplan–Meier plotter online database was used to analyze the clinical effect of GDF15 gene expression in gastric cancer patients ( http://kmplot.com/analysis/ ). (C) Clinical effect of GDF15 serum levels (≥upper quartile 1066.79 ng/mL vs. <upper quartile) on overall survival and disease‐free survival. HR, hazard ratio; N, normal; STAD, stomach adenocarcinoma database; T, tumor. * p < 0.01.
Human Gdf 15, supplied by Protein Simple Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+gdf+15/pm39940753-215-4-18?v=Protein+Simple+Inc
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human gdf 15 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
R&D Systems recombinant gdf15 957 gd
a , b , Change in body weight ( a ) and food intake ( b ) of 26–28-week-old male DIO C57BL/6J mice following 7 days of treatment with the indicated dose of N -acetyltaurine (NAT; i.p.). For saline versus N -acetyltaurine (15 mg per kg per day), P = 5.95 × 10 –4 ; for saline versus N -acetyltaurine (50 mg per kg per day), P = 6.3 × 10 –4 . N = 5 per group for vehicle, 1 and 5 mg per kg per day; N = 6 per group for 15 and 50 mg per kg per day. c , d , Change in body weight ( c ) and food intake ( d ) of 19–21-week-old male DIO C57BL/6J mice following treatment with the indicated metabolite at a dose of 15 mg per kg per day (i.p.). N = 5 per group. e – g , Western blots with anti-PTER (top) and anti-tubulin (bottom) antibodies ( e ), N -acetyltaurine hydrolysis activity ( f ) and tissue N -acetyltaurine levels ( g ) from cortex (Cort.), hypothalamus (Hyp.) and brainstem (BS) of WT mice and Pter KO mice. For WT versus Pter KO brainstem, P = 6.65 × 10 –4 . N = 6 per group for f and g . h , Change in 24-h food intake of 6-month-old male DIO mice treated with a single dose of <t>GDF15</t> (0.1 mg kg –1 , i.p.) in the presence of anti-GFRAL antibody (10 mg kg –1 , i.p.) or IgG control antibody (10 mg kg –1 , i.p.). N = 5 per group. i , j , Change in body weight ( i ) and cumulative food intake ( j ) of 16-week-old male DIO mice following saline or N -acetyltaurine (15 mg per kg per day, i.p.) treatment and with IgG or anti-GFRAL antibody co-treatment (10 mg kg –1 , i.p., once every 3 days). N = 10 per group. Data are shown as the mean ± s.e.m. For e , the loading control was performed on the same blot. In a – d and f – h , P values were calculated from two-tailed unpaired t -tests and were not corrected for multiple comparisons. In i and j , P values were calculated from two-way ANOVA with post hoc Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. All experiments were performed once.
Recombinant Gdf15 957 Gd, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+gdf+15/pmc11374699-263-0-6?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant gdf15 957 gd - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
OriGene pcmv myc gdf15
a , b , Change in body weight ( a ) and food intake ( b ) of 26–28-week-old male DIO C57BL/6J mice following 7 days of treatment with the indicated dose of N -acetyltaurine (NAT; i.p.). For saline versus N -acetyltaurine (15 mg per kg per day), P = 5.95 × 10 –4 ; for saline versus N -acetyltaurine (50 mg per kg per day), P = 6.3 × 10 –4 . N = 5 per group for vehicle, 1 and 5 mg per kg per day; N = 6 per group for 15 and 50 mg per kg per day. c , d , Change in body weight ( c ) and food intake ( d ) of 19–21-week-old male DIO C57BL/6J mice following treatment with the indicated metabolite at a dose of 15 mg per kg per day (i.p.). N = 5 per group. e – g , Western blots with anti-PTER (top) and anti-tubulin (bottom) antibodies ( e ), N -acetyltaurine hydrolysis activity ( f ) and tissue N -acetyltaurine levels ( g ) from cortex (Cort.), hypothalamus (Hyp.) and brainstem (BS) of WT mice and Pter KO mice. For WT versus Pter KO brainstem, P = 6.65 × 10 –4 . N = 6 per group for f and g . h , Change in 24-h food intake of 6-month-old male DIO mice treated with a single dose of <t>GDF15</t> (0.1 mg kg –1 , i.p.) in the presence of anti-GFRAL antibody (10 mg kg –1 , i.p.) or IgG control antibody (10 mg kg –1 , i.p.). N = 5 per group. i , j , Change in body weight ( i ) and cumulative food intake ( j ) of 16-week-old male DIO mice following saline or N -acetyltaurine (15 mg per kg per day, i.p.) treatment and with IgG or anti-GFRAL antibody co-treatment (10 mg kg –1 , i.p., once every 3 days). N = 10 per group. Data are shown as the mean ± s.e.m. For e , the loading control was performed on the same blot. In a – d and f – h , P values were calculated from two-tailed unpaired t -tests and were not corrected for multiple comparisons. In i and j , P values were calculated from two-way ANOVA with post hoc Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. All experiments were performed once.
Pcmv Myc Gdf15, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/human+gdf+15/pmc04262834-111-17-21?v=OriGene
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pcmv myc gdf15 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Women with hsCRP have high levels of GDF15. (a, b) Serum GDF15 levels were quantified by ELISA from HANDLS participants with either low- (<3 mg/L), mid- (>3–20 mg/L), or high hsCRP (>20 mg/L) levels ( n = 39/group). The ELISA assay was performed according to manufacturer's instructions and was repeated in 2 independent experiments. (c) RNA was isolated from PBMCs from HANDLS participants with either low- (<3 mg/L) or high hsCRP (>20 mg/L) levels ( n = 15/group). GDF15 mRNA was quantified by RT-qPCR and normalized to HPRT1 and UBC levels. The histograms represent the mean + SEM from three independent experiments. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 by Student's t -test.

Journal: Mediators of Inflammation

Article Title: CRP Stimulates GDF15 Expression in Endothelial Cells through p53

doi: 10.1155/2018/8278039

Figure Lengend Snippet: Women with hsCRP have high levels of GDF15. (a, b) Serum GDF15 levels were quantified by ELISA from HANDLS participants with either low- (<3 mg/L), mid- (>3–20 mg/L), or high hsCRP (>20 mg/L) levels ( n = 39/group). The ELISA assay was performed according to manufacturer's instructions and was repeated in 2 independent experiments. (c) RNA was isolated from PBMCs from HANDLS participants with either low- (<3 mg/L) or high hsCRP (>20 mg/L) levels ( n = 15/group). GDF15 mRNA was quantified by RT-qPCR and normalized to HPRT1 and UBC levels. The histograms represent the mean + SEM from three independent experiments. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 by Student's t -test.

Article Snippet: Human GDF15 Quantikine ELISA Kit (R&D Systems) was used according to the manufacturer's directions.

Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Isolation, Quantitative RT-PCR

CRP upregulates GDF15 expression. (a) 18 h after CRP treatment with the indicated doses, GDF15 expression in HAECs was analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-GDF15 antibodies. β -Actin was used as a loading control. (b) After CRP treatment for the indicated time points, conditioned media was collected and GDF15 secreted levels were analyzed by ELISA. GDF15 levels were normalized to the 0 h time point for each experiment. The mean of three independent experiments is shown. (c and d) 18 h after CRP (25 μ g/mL) treatment, HAECs were lysed and levels of GDF15 mRNA or protein were quantified by RT-qPCR analysis (c) and western blot analysis (d). (e) HAECs were transfected with pCMV6-control or pCMV6-CRP plasmid for 48 h. Total RNA was isolated, and mRNA levels were quantified using RT-qPCR and normalized to GAPDH . (f) Total cell lysates from the indicated transfected HAECs were analyzed by Western blotting. β -Actin was used as a loading control. The histograms represent the mean + SEM from three independent experiments. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 by Student's t -test.

Journal: Mediators of Inflammation

Article Title: CRP Stimulates GDF15 Expression in Endothelial Cells through p53

doi: 10.1155/2018/8278039

Figure Lengend Snippet: CRP upregulates GDF15 expression. (a) 18 h after CRP treatment with the indicated doses, GDF15 expression in HAECs was analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-GDF15 antibodies. β -Actin was used as a loading control. (b) After CRP treatment for the indicated time points, conditioned media was collected and GDF15 secreted levels were analyzed by ELISA. GDF15 levels were normalized to the 0 h time point for each experiment. The mean of three independent experiments is shown. (c and d) 18 h after CRP (25 μ g/mL) treatment, HAECs were lysed and levels of GDF15 mRNA or protein were quantified by RT-qPCR analysis (c) and western blot analysis (d). (e) HAECs were transfected with pCMV6-control or pCMV6-CRP plasmid for 48 h. Total RNA was isolated, and mRNA levels were quantified using RT-qPCR and normalized to GAPDH . (f) Total cell lysates from the indicated transfected HAECs were analyzed by Western blotting. β -Actin was used as a loading control. The histograms represent the mean + SEM from three independent experiments. ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 by Student's t -test.

Article Snippet: Human GDF15 Quantikine ELISA Kit (R&D Systems) was used according to the manufacturer's directions.

Techniques: Expressing, Western Blot, Control, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Quantitative RT-PCR, Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Isolation

CRP promotes GDF15 transcription. (a) Schematic of GDF15 promotor dual-luciferase constructs. Two p53 binding sites are indicated. (b) The indicated plasmids (1 μ g) were cotransfected with 0.1 μ g of TK-Renilla reporter plasmid in HeLa cells, and 24 h later, the cells were treated with CRP. After 18 h, the promoter activities were measured by luciferase activity. Transfection efficiency for luciferase activity was normalized to the Renilla luciferase activity. The results show the mean + SEM of three independent transfections. ∗∗ p < 0.01 by Student's t -test. (c) Schematic of p53 binding sites and primers used for ChIP assays in the GDF15 promoter. (d) ChIP assays were performed on HAECs transfected for 24 h and treated with or without CRP for 18 h. DNA immunoprecipitated by antibodies to p53 or immunoglobulin G IgG (control) was amplified by qPCR. Each qPCR reaction was performed in triplicate, and the histogram represents the average of three independent ChIP assays + SEM.

Journal: Mediators of Inflammation

Article Title: CRP Stimulates GDF15 Expression in Endothelial Cells through p53

doi: 10.1155/2018/8278039

Figure Lengend Snippet: CRP promotes GDF15 transcription. (a) Schematic of GDF15 promotor dual-luciferase constructs. Two p53 binding sites are indicated. (b) The indicated plasmids (1 μ g) were cotransfected with 0.1 μ g of TK-Renilla reporter plasmid in HeLa cells, and 24 h later, the cells were treated with CRP. After 18 h, the promoter activities were measured by luciferase activity. Transfection efficiency for luciferase activity was normalized to the Renilla luciferase activity. The results show the mean + SEM of three independent transfections. ∗∗ p < 0.01 by Student's t -test. (c) Schematic of p53 binding sites and primers used for ChIP assays in the GDF15 promoter. (d) ChIP assays were performed on HAECs transfected for 24 h and treated with or without CRP for 18 h. DNA immunoprecipitated by antibodies to p53 or immunoglobulin G IgG (control) was amplified by qPCR. Each qPCR reaction was performed in triplicate, and the histogram represents the average of three independent ChIP assays + SEM.

Article Snippet: Human GDF15 Quantikine ELISA Kit (R&D Systems) was used according to the manufacturer's directions.

Techniques: Luciferase, Construct, Binding Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Activity Assay, Transfection, Immunoprecipitation, Control, Amplification

p53 knockdown inhibits CRP-induced GDF15 expression. HAECs were transfected with either Ctrl siRNA or p53 siRNA for 24 h and treated with or without CRP for 18 h. GDF15 mRNA levels were examined by RT-qPCR (a), and protein levels were analyzed by Western blot analysis (b). The histogram represents the mean + SEM from three independent experiments. ∗ p < 0.05 and ∗∗ p < 0.01 by Student's t -test.

Journal: Mediators of Inflammation

Article Title: CRP Stimulates GDF15 Expression in Endothelial Cells through p53

doi: 10.1155/2018/8278039

Figure Lengend Snippet: p53 knockdown inhibits CRP-induced GDF15 expression. HAECs were transfected with either Ctrl siRNA or p53 siRNA for 24 h and treated with or without CRP for 18 h. GDF15 mRNA levels were examined by RT-qPCR (a), and protein levels were analyzed by Western blot analysis (b). The histogram represents the mean + SEM from three independent experiments. ∗ p < 0.05 and ∗∗ p < 0.01 by Student's t -test.

Article Snippet: Human GDF15 Quantikine ELISA Kit (R&D Systems) was used according to the manufacturer's directions.

Techniques: Knockdown, Expressing, Transfection, Quantitative RT-PCR, Western Blot

Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) expression is elevated in gastric cancer and high serum GDF15 level is a poor prognostic factor. (A) GDF15 gene expression level in gastric cancer patients illustrated with boxplots by the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) online database. (B) The Kaplan–Meier plotter online database was used to analyze the clinical effect of GDF15 gene expression in gastric cancer patients ( http://kmplot.com/analysis/ ). (C) Clinical effect of GDF15 serum levels (≥upper quartile 1066.79 ng/mL vs. <upper quartile) on overall survival and disease‐free survival. HR, hazard ratio; N, normal; STAD, stomach adenocarcinoma database; T, tumor. * p < 0.01.

Journal: Cancer Science

Article Title: Growth differentiation factor 15 induces cisplatin resistance through upregulation of xCT expression and glutathione synthesis in gastric cancer

doi: 10.1111/cas.15869

Figure Lengend Snippet: Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) expression is elevated in gastric cancer and high serum GDF15 level is a poor prognostic factor. (A) GDF15 gene expression level in gastric cancer patients illustrated with boxplots by the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) online database. (B) The Kaplan–Meier plotter online database was used to analyze the clinical effect of GDF15 gene expression in gastric cancer patients ( http://kmplot.com/analysis/ ). (C) Clinical effect of GDF15 serum levels (≥upper quartile 1066.79 ng/mL vs.

Article Snippet: The GDF15 neutralizing Ab (MAB957) and recombinant human GDF15 ( Escherichia coli ‐expressed) protein (#9279‐GD‐050) were obtained from R&D Systems.

Techniques: Expressing, Gene Expression

Clinical characteristics of patients with gastric cancer with different growth differentiation factor 15  (GDF15)  expression of tumor tissues

Journal: Cancer Science

Article Title: Growth differentiation factor 15 induces cisplatin resistance through upregulation of xCT expression and glutathione synthesis in gastric cancer

doi: 10.1111/cas.15869

Figure Lengend Snippet: Clinical characteristics of patients with gastric cancer with different growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) expression of tumor tissues

Article Snippet: The GDF15 neutralizing Ab (MAB957) and recombinant human GDF15 ( Escherichia coli ‐expressed) protein (#9279‐GD‐050) were obtained from R&D Systems.

Techniques: Expressing

Clinical characteristics of patients with gastric cancer with low or high serum growth differentiation factor 15  (GDF15)  levels

Journal: Cancer Science

Article Title: Growth differentiation factor 15 induces cisplatin resistance through upregulation of xCT expression and glutathione synthesis in gastric cancer

doi: 10.1111/cas.15869

Figure Lengend Snippet: Clinical characteristics of patients with gastric cancer with low or high serum growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) levels

Article Snippet: The GDF15 neutralizing Ab (MAB957) and recombinant human GDF15 ( Escherichia coli ‐expressed) protein (#9279‐GD‐050) were obtained from R&D Systems.

Techniques:

Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) expression is essential for cell proliferation and migration of gastric cancer cells. (A, C) siGDF15 (180 pmol for 3 × 10 5 cells in a 6‐cm dish for 48 h) or (B, D) pcDNA‐GDF15 (pGDF15, 6 μg for 3 × 10 5 cells in a 6‐cm dish for 12 h, followed by replacement of fresh medium for a total of 48 h) were used to knockdown or overexpress GDF15. Efficiencies of knockdown and overexpression were analyzed by quantitative real‐time PCR. (A, B) After transfection with siGDF15 or pGDF15, cells were reseeded with a density of 3000 cells per well in a 96‐well plate. Cell proliferation was analyzed with sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay. (C, D) After transfection with siGDF15 or pGDF15, cells were reseeded with a density of 1 × 10 5 cells per Transwell insert. Cell migration was determined by Transwell migration assay (siGDF15: AGS, NUGC‐3, and TSGH9201 for 12, 16, and 24 h migration, respectively; magnification, 200×) (pGDF15: AGS, NUGC‐3, and TSGH9201 for 8, 12, and 24 h migration, respectively; magnification, 100×). Graph is presented as mean ± SEM ( n ≥ 3). *Significant vs. individual control.

Journal: Cancer Science

Article Title: Growth differentiation factor 15 induces cisplatin resistance through upregulation of xCT expression and glutathione synthesis in gastric cancer

doi: 10.1111/cas.15869

Figure Lengend Snippet: Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) expression is essential for cell proliferation and migration of gastric cancer cells. (A, C) siGDF15 (180 pmol for 3 × 10 5 cells in a 6‐cm dish for 48 h) or (B, D) pcDNA‐GDF15 (pGDF15, 6 μg for 3 × 10 5 cells in a 6‐cm dish for 12 h, followed by replacement of fresh medium for a total of 48 h) were used to knockdown or overexpress GDF15. Efficiencies of knockdown and overexpression were analyzed by quantitative real‐time PCR. (A, B) After transfection with siGDF15 or pGDF15, cells were reseeded with a density of 3000 cells per well in a 96‐well plate. Cell proliferation was analyzed with sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay. (C, D) After transfection with siGDF15 or pGDF15, cells were reseeded with a density of 1 × 10 5 cells per Transwell insert. Cell migration was determined by Transwell migration assay (siGDF15: AGS, NUGC‐3, and TSGH9201 for 12, 16, and 24 h migration, respectively; magnification, 200×) (pGDF15: AGS, NUGC‐3, and TSGH9201 for 8, 12, and 24 h migration, respectively; magnification, 100×). Graph is presented as mean ± SEM ( n ≥ 3). *Significant vs. individual control.

Article Snippet: The GDF15 neutralizing Ab (MAB957) and recombinant human GDF15 ( Escherichia coli ‐expressed) protein (#9279‐GD‐050) were obtained from R&D Systems.

Techniques: Expressing, Migration, Knockdown, Over Expression, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Transfection, Sulforhodamine B Assay, Transwell Migration Assay, Control

Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) contributes to cisplatin resistance in human gastric cancer cells. (A–C) GDF15 (A) gene and (B) protein expressions and (C) released GDF15 level between parental (P) and cisplatin‐resistant (CisR) gastric cancer cells were analyzed with quantitative real‐time PCR, western blotting, and ELISA assays, respectively. (D, E) Cisplatin sensitivity (48 h) of the gastric cancer cells was assessed using (D) sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay and (E) propidium iodide (PI) exclusion assay. (F–H) Effects of (F) GDF15 neutralizing Ab (GDF15 NAb), (G) recombinant human GDF15 (rhGDF15), and (H) GDF15 overexpression on sensitivity of cisplatin were evaluated with SRB assay. G, GDF15 plasmid; V, empty vector. Quantitative real‐time PCR and western blotting were used to validate the efficiencies of GDF15 knockdown or overexpression, respectively. Graph is presented by mean ± SEM ( n ≥ 3). *Significant vs. individual control. ** , ***Significant, rhGDF15 (20 and 50 ng/mL) vs. individual control.

Journal: Cancer Science

Article Title: Growth differentiation factor 15 induces cisplatin resistance through upregulation of xCT expression and glutathione synthesis in gastric cancer

doi: 10.1111/cas.15869

Figure Lengend Snippet: Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) contributes to cisplatin resistance in human gastric cancer cells. (A–C) GDF15 (A) gene and (B) protein expressions and (C) released GDF15 level between parental (P) and cisplatin‐resistant (CisR) gastric cancer cells were analyzed with quantitative real‐time PCR, western blotting, and ELISA assays, respectively. (D, E) Cisplatin sensitivity (48 h) of the gastric cancer cells was assessed using (D) sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay and (E) propidium iodide (PI) exclusion assay. (F–H) Effects of (F) GDF15 neutralizing Ab (GDF15 NAb), (G) recombinant human GDF15 (rhGDF15), and (H) GDF15 overexpression on sensitivity of cisplatin were evaluated with SRB assay. G, GDF15 plasmid; V, empty vector. Quantitative real‐time PCR and western blotting were used to validate the efficiencies of GDF15 knockdown or overexpression, respectively. Graph is presented by mean ± SEM ( n ≥ 3). *Significant vs. individual control. ** , ***Significant, rhGDF15 (20 and 50 ng/mL) vs. individual control.

Article Snippet: The GDF15 neutralizing Ab (MAB957) and recombinant human GDF15 ( Escherichia coli ‐expressed) protein (#9279‐GD‐050) were obtained from R&D Systems.

Techniques: Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Western Blot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Sulforhodamine B Assay, Exclusion Assay, Recombinant, Over Expression, Plasmid Preparation, Knockdown, Control

Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15)‐upregulated xCT expression through the eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α)‐activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) pathway enhances intracellular glutathione (GSH) levels in cisplatin‐resistant gastric cancer cells. (A) Knockdown efficiency was validated using western blotting. (B) Effects of siGDF15 and glial cell‐derived neurotrophic factor family receptor a‐like siRNA (siGFRAL) on GSH levels were evaluated using the GSH detection kit. (C, D) After treatment of GDF15‐knockdown cisplatin‐resistant (CisR) cells with cisplatin (24 h), intracellular and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species were evaluated with (C) dichlorodihydro‐fluorescein (DCF) and (D) MitoSox Red using flow cytometry. (E) GDF15 and xCT gene expressions were evaluated using quantitative real‐time PCR. (F) Protein expression of GDF15 and the eIF2α‐xCT pathway were evaluated using western blotting. (G) After transfections with different xCT promoters (WT, antioxidant‐responsive element [ARE]‐mutant, and amino acid response element [AARE]‐mutant), the cells were further transfected with siGDF15. Graph is presented as mean ± SEM ( n ≥ 3). *Significant vs. individual control. **Significant vs. WT/ARE‐mutant‐xCT promoters.

Journal: Cancer Science

Article Title: Growth differentiation factor 15 induces cisplatin resistance through upregulation of xCT expression and glutathione synthesis in gastric cancer

doi: 10.1111/cas.15869

Figure Lengend Snippet: Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15)‐upregulated xCT expression through the eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α)‐activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) pathway enhances intracellular glutathione (GSH) levels in cisplatin‐resistant gastric cancer cells. (A) Knockdown efficiency was validated using western blotting. (B) Effects of siGDF15 and glial cell‐derived neurotrophic factor family receptor a‐like siRNA (siGFRAL) on GSH levels were evaluated using the GSH detection kit. (C, D) After treatment of GDF15‐knockdown cisplatin‐resistant (CisR) cells with cisplatin (24 h), intracellular and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species were evaluated with (C) dichlorodihydro‐fluorescein (DCF) and (D) MitoSox Red using flow cytometry. (E) GDF15 and xCT gene expressions were evaluated using quantitative real‐time PCR. (F) Protein expression of GDF15 and the eIF2α‐xCT pathway were evaluated using western blotting. (G) After transfections with different xCT promoters (WT, antioxidant‐responsive element [ARE]‐mutant, and amino acid response element [AARE]‐mutant), the cells were further transfected with siGDF15. Graph is presented as mean ± SEM ( n ≥ 3). *Significant vs. individual control. **Significant vs. WT/ARE‐mutant‐xCT promoters.

Article Snippet: The GDF15 neutralizing Ab (MAB957) and recombinant human GDF15 ( Escherichia coli ‐expressed) protein (#9279‐GD‐050) were obtained from R&D Systems.

Techniques: Expressing, Knockdown, Western Blot, Derivative Assay, Flow Cytometry, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Transfection, Mutagenesis, Control

Eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α)‐activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4)‐xCT‐elevated glutathione (GSH) contributes to growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15)‐mediated cisplatin resistance in gastric cancer cells. (A, B, D) Cells were transfected with pcDNA‐GDF15. G, GDF15 plasmid; V, empty vector. (A, D) Gene expressions of GDF15 and xCT were evaluated using quantitative real‐time PCR. (B) The eIF2α‐ATF4‐xCT pathway was evaluated using western blotting. (C) After transfection with different types of xCT promoters, HEK293T cells were further transfected with pcDNA‐GDF15. (D) After overexpression of GDF15, the effects of sulfasalazine (SSA, 350 μM) and buthionine sulfoximine (BSO, 0.5 mM) on cisplatin sensitivity (48 h) were evaluated with propidium iodide (PI) exclusion assay. Graph is presented as mean ± SEM ( n ≥ 3). *Significant vs. individual control. **Significant vs. WT/antioxidant‐responsive element (ARE)‐mutant xCT promoters. # Significant vs. pcDNA. ## Significant vs. cisplatin treatment. AARE, amino acid response element; Con, control.

Journal: Cancer Science

Article Title: Growth differentiation factor 15 induces cisplatin resistance through upregulation of xCT expression and glutathione synthesis in gastric cancer

doi: 10.1111/cas.15869

Figure Lengend Snippet: Eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α)‐activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4)‐xCT‐elevated glutathione (GSH) contributes to growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15)‐mediated cisplatin resistance in gastric cancer cells. (A, B, D) Cells were transfected with pcDNA‐GDF15. G, GDF15 plasmid; V, empty vector. (A, D) Gene expressions of GDF15 and xCT were evaluated using quantitative real‐time PCR. (B) The eIF2α‐ATF4‐xCT pathway was evaluated using western blotting. (C) After transfection with different types of xCT promoters, HEK293T cells were further transfected with pcDNA‐GDF15. (D) After overexpression of GDF15, the effects of sulfasalazine (SSA, 350 μM) and buthionine sulfoximine (BSO, 0.5 mM) on cisplatin sensitivity (48 h) were evaluated with propidium iodide (PI) exclusion assay. Graph is presented as mean ± SEM ( n ≥ 3). *Significant vs. individual control. **Significant vs. WT/antioxidant‐responsive element (ARE)‐mutant xCT promoters. # Significant vs. pcDNA. ## Significant vs. cisplatin treatment. AARE, amino acid response element; Con, control.

Article Snippet: The GDF15 neutralizing Ab (MAB957) and recombinant human GDF15 ( Escherichia coli ‐expressed) protein (#9279‐GD‐050) were obtained from R&D Systems.

Techniques: Transfection, Plasmid Preparation, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Western Blot, Over Expression, Exclusion Assay, Control, Mutagenesis

Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15)/ glial cell‐derived neurotrophic factor family receptor a‐like (GFRAL)‐mediated signaling in cisplatin‐resistant gastric cancer cells could be through general control nonderepressible 2 (GCN2). (A, B) siGDF15 and siGFRAL were transfected into (A) AGS cisplatin‐resistant (CisR) and (B) NUGC‐3CisR cells. (C) AGSCisR and (D) NUGC‐3CisR cells were treated with SPP86 (5 μΜ) for 24 h. Upstream regulators of the eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) and eIF2α‐activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4)‐xCT pathways were analyzed using western blotting. Graph is presented as mean ± SEM ( n ≥ 3). *Significant vs. individual control (Con). PERK, PKR‐like endoplasmic reticulum kinase; PKR, protein kinase R.

Journal: Cancer Science

Article Title: Growth differentiation factor 15 induces cisplatin resistance through upregulation of xCT expression and glutathione synthesis in gastric cancer

doi: 10.1111/cas.15869

Figure Lengend Snippet: Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15)/ glial cell‐derived neurotrophic factor family receptor a‐like (GFRAL)‐mediated signaling in cisplatin‐resistant gastric cancer cells could be through general control nonderepressible 2 (GCN2). (A, B) siGDF15 and siGFRAL were transfected into (A) AGS cisplatin‐resistant (CisR) and (B) NUGC‐3CisR cells. (C) AGSCisR and (D) NUGC‐3CisR cells were treated with SPP86 (5 μΜ) for 24 h. Upstream regulators of the eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) and eIF2α‐activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4)‐xCT pathways were analyzed using western blotting. Graph is presented as mean ± SEM ( n ≥ 3). *Significant vs. individual control (Con). PERK, PKR‐like endoplasmic reticulum kinase; PKR, protein kinase R.

Article Snippet: The GDF15 neutralizing Ab (MAB957) and recombinant human GDF15 ( Escherichia coli ‐expressed) protein (#9279‐GD‐050) were obtained from R&D Systems.

Techniques: Derivative Assay, Control, Transfection, Western Blot

General control nonderepressible 2 (GCN2) is responsible for growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15)‐mediated glial cell‐derived neurotrophic factor family receptor a‐like (GFRAL)‐eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α)‐activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4)‐xCT signaling and cisplatin resistance. (A, B, D) After GDF15 overexpression by pcDNA‐GDF15 (G, pcDNA‐GDF15; V, pcDNA alone), cells were treated with siRNAs against (A) protein kinase R (PKR), (B) heme‐regulated eIF2α kinase (HRI), and (D) GCN2 for 48 h. The effect of siRNAs against PKR, HRI, and GCN2 on GDF15‐mediated eIF2α‐ATF4‐xCT regulation was assessed using western blotting. (C) Effects of siHRI and siPKR on cisplatin resistance in cisplatin‐resistant (CisR) cells was evaluated with sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay. Graph is presented as mean ± SEM ( n ≥ 3). *Significant vs. individual control. **Significant vs. siScr with GDF15 overexpression.

Journal: Cancer Science

Article Title: Growth differentiation factor 15 induces cisplatin resistance through upregulation of xCT expression and glutathione synthesis in gastric cancer

doi: 10.1111/cas.15869

Figure Lengend Snippet: General control nonderepressible 2 (GCN2) is responsible for growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15)‐mediated glial cell‐derived neurotrophic factor family receptor a‐like (GFRAL)‐eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α)‐activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4)‐xCT signaling and cisplatin resistance. (A, B, D) After GDF15 overexpression by pcDNA‐GDF15 (G, pcDNA‐GDF15; V, pcDNA alone), cells were treated with siRNAs against (A) protein kinase R (PKR), (B) heme‐regulated eIF2α kinase (HRI), and (D) GCN2 for 48 h. The effect of siRNAs against PKR, HRI, and GCN2 on GDF15‐mediated eIF2α‐ATF4‐xCT regulation was assessed using western blotting. (C) Effects of siHRI and siPKR on cisplatin resistance in cisplatin‐resistant (CisR) cells was evaluated with sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay. Graph is presented as mean ± SEM ( n ≥ 3). *Significant vs. individual control. **Significant vs. siScr with GDF15 overexpression.

Article Snippet: The GDF15 neutralizing Ab (MAB957) and recombinant human GDF15 ( Escherichia coli ‐expressed) protein (#9279‐GD‐050) were obtained from R&D Systems.

Techniques: Control, Derivative Assay, Over Expression, Western Blot, Sulforhodamine B Assay

Proposed mechanism of growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15)‐mediated cisplatin resistance. In the present study, we found that GDF15‐elevated glutathione (GSH) through the glial cell‐derived neurotrophic factor family receptor a‐like (GFRAL)‐general control nonderepressible 2 (GCN2)‐eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α)‐activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4)‐xCT pathway enhances cisplatin resistance for gastric cancer. Figure was created by Servier Medical Art. PKR, protein kinase R; RET, rearranged during transfection; ROS, reactive oxygen species.

Journal: Cancer Science

Article Title: Growth differentiation factor 15 induces cisplatin resistance through upregulation of xCT expression and glutathione synthesis in gastric cancer

doi: 10.1111/cas.15869

Figure Lengend Snippet: Proposed mechanism of growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15)‐mediated cisplatin resistance. In the present study, we found that GDF15‐elevated glutathione (GSH) through the glial cell‐derived neurotrophic factor family receptor a‐like (GFRAL)‐general control nonderepressible 2 (GCN2)‐eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α)‐activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4)‐xCT pathway enhances cisplatin resistance for gastric cancer. Figure was created by Servier Medical Art. PKR, protein kinase R; RET, rearranged during transfection; ROS, reactive oxygen species.

Article Snippet: The GDF15 neutralizing Ab (MAB957) and recombinant human GDF15 ( Escherichia coli ‐expressed) protein (#9279‐GD‐050) were obtained from R&D Systems.

Techniques: Derivative Assay, Control, Transfection

a , b , Change in body weight ( a ) and food intake ( b ) of 26–28-week-old male DIO C57BL/6J mice following 7 days of treatment with the indicated dose of N -acetyltaurine (NAT; i.p.). For saline versus N -acetyltaurine (15 mg per kg per day), P = 5.95 × 10 –4 ; for saline versus N -acetyltaurine (50 mg per kg per day), P = 6.3 × 10 –4 . N = 5 per group for vehicle, 1 and 5 mg per kg per day; N = 6 per group for 15 and 50 mg per kg per day. c , d , Change in body weight ( c ) and food intake ( d ) of 19–21-week-old male DIO C57BL/6J mice following treatment with the indicated metabolite at a dose of 15 mg per kg per day (i.p.). N = 5 per group. e – g , Western blots with anti-PTER (top) and anti-tubulin (bottom) antibodies ( e ), N -acetyltaurine hydrolysis activity ( f ) and tissue N -acetyltaurine levels ( g ) from cortex (Cort.), hypothalamus (Hyp.) and brainstem (BS) of WT mice and Pter KO mice. For WT versus Pter KO brainstem, P = 6.65 × 10 –4 . N = 6 per group for f and g . h , Change in 24-h food intake of 6-month-old male DIO mice treated with a single dose of GDF15 (0.1 mg kg –1 , i.p.) in the presence of anti-GFRAL antibody (10 mg kg –1 , i.p.) or IgG control antibody (10 mg kg –1 , i.p.). N = 5 per group. i , j , Change in body weight ( i ) and cumulative food intake ( j ) of 16-week-old male DIO mice following saline or N -acetyltaurine (15 mg per kg per day, i.p.) treatment and with IgG or anti-GFRAL antibody co-treatment (10 mg kg –1 , i.p., once every 3 days). N = 10 per group. Data are shown as the mean ± s.e.m. For e , the loading control was performed on the same blot. In a – d and f – h , P values were calculated from two-tailed unpaired t -tests and were not corrected for multiple comparisons. In i and j , P values were calculated from two-way ANOVA with post hoc Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. All experiments were performed once.

Journal: Nature

Article Title: PTER is a N -acetyltaurine hydrolase that regulates feeding and obesity

doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07801-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: a , b , Change in body weight ( a ) and food intake ( b ) of 26–28-week-old male DIO C57BL/6J mice following 7 days of treatment with the indicated dose of N -acetyltaurine (NAT; i.p.). For saline versus N -acetyltaurine (15 mg per kg per day), P = 5.95 × 10 –4 ; for saline versus N -acetyltaurine (50 mg per kg per day), P = 6.3 × 10 –4 . N = 5 per group for vehicle, 1 and 5 mg per kg per day; N = 6 per group for 15 and 50 mg per kg per day. c , d , Change in body weight ( c ) and food intake ( d ) of 19–21-week-old male DIO C57BL/6J mice following treatment with the indicated metabolite at a dose of 15 mg per kg per day (i.p.). N = 5 per group. e – g , Western blots with anti-PTER (top) and anti-tubulin (bottom) antibodies ( e ), N -acetyltaurine hydrolysis activity ( f ) and tissue N -acetyltaurine levels ( g ) from cortex (Cort.), hypothalamus (Hyp.) and brainstem (BS) of WT mice and Pter KO mice. For WT versus Pter KO brainstem, P = 6.65 × 10 –4 . N = 6 per group for f and g . h , Change in 24-h food intake of 6-month-old male DIO mice treated with a single dose of GDF15 (0.1 mg kg –1 , i.p.) in the presence of anti-GFRAL antibody (10 mg kg –1 , i.p.) or IgG control antibody (10 mg kg –1 , i.p.). N = 5 per group. i , j , Change in body weight ( i ) and cumulative food intake ( j ) of 16-week-old male DIO mice following saline or N -acetyltaurine (15 mg per kg per day, i.p.) treatment and with IgG or anti-GFRAL antibody co-treatment (10 mg kg –1 , i.p., once every 3 days). N = 10 per group. Data are shown as the mean ± s.e.m. For e , the loading control was performed on the same blot. In a – d and f – h , P values were calculated from two-tailed unpaired t -tests and were not corrected for multiple comparisons. In i and j , P values were calculated from two-way ANOVA with post hoc Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. All experiments were performed once.

Article Snippet: Recombinant GDF15 (957-GD) was purchased from R&D Systems.

Techniques: Saline, Western Blot, Activity Assay, Control, Two Tailed Test

Related to Fig. . a - d , Body weight ( a , b ) and food intake ( c , d ) of 6 to 7-month-old DIO male C57BL/6J mice after a 7-day treatment of saline or N-acetyltaurine (15 mg/kg/day, IP) or GLP-1 (2 mg/kg/day, IP) with or without Exendin-3 (0.1 mg/kg/day, IP). N = 7/group. NAT, N-acetyltaurine. e , f , Body weight ( e ) and food intake ( f ) of 5-month-old DIO male C57BL/6J mice or 3 to 4-month-old MC4R-KO mice on high fat diet after a 7-day treatment of saline or N-acetyltaurine (15 mg/kg/day, IP). N = 6/group. NAT, N-acetyltaurine. g , Plasma GDF15 (left), GLP-1 (middle) and leptin (right) levels of 19 to 21-week-old male DIO C57BL/6J mice following treatment with N-acetyltaurine 15 mg/kg/day (IP) or saline. N = 5 per group. NAT, N-acetyltaurine. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. P-values were calculated from two-tailed unpaired t-tests.

Journal: Nature

Article Title: PTER is a N -acetyltaurine hydrolase that regulates feeding and obesity

doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07801-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: Related to Fig. . a - d , Body weight ( a , b ) and food intake ( c , d ) of 6 to 7-month-old DIO male C57BL/6J mice after a 7-day treatment of saline or N-acetyltaurine (15 mg/kg/day, IP) or GLP-1 (2 mg/kg/day, IP) with or without Exendin-3 (0.1 mg/kg/day, IP). N = 7/group. NAT, N-acetyltaurine. e , f , Body weight ( e ) and food intake ( f ) of 5-month-old DIO male C57BL/6J mice or 3 to 4-month-old MC4R-KO mice on high fat diet after a 7-day treatment of saline or N-acetyltaurine (15 mg/kg/day, IP). N = 6/group. NAT, N-acetyltaurine. g , Plasma GDF15 (left), GLP-1 (middle) and leptin (right) levels of 19 to 21-week-old male DIO C57BL/6J mice following treatment with N-acetyltaurine 15 mg/kg/day (IP) or saline. N = 5 per group. NAT, N-acetyltaurine. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. P-values were calculated from two-tailed unpaired t-tests.

Article Snippet: Recombinant GDF15 (957-GD) was purchased from R&D Systems.

Techniques: Saline, Clinical Proteomics, Two Tailed Test